- 69 -
To envision Matt's unusual stride, conjure up a favorite memory of Walt Disney’s beloved Goofy. Picture his overall awkward physical presence and movement style: the gangly posture, the way he leans backward with his head forward, the uncoordinated saunter, uneven steps, and constant unsteadiness—right up until one of his spectacular slapstick tumbles.
While Goofy offers a recognizable and sometimes humorous visual, the underlying reality of Matt’s ambulation is more serious. If you’ve ever seen someone with cerebral palsy walk, you’ve gotten a glimpse of Matt’s mobility and, more importantly, a sense of our constant concern for his safety. His slightly crouched, ungainly bearing is a fusion of struggles: sometimes the scissoring of his feet, especially the right, which often grazes or kicks the left on its way past, or swings boldly in front of it, causes him to stumble. As he fatigues, his right leg stiffens, drags, or catches. If his step comes up short, Matt may suddenly lurch forward and, without a nearby hand to steady him, he could topple. This simplified, somewhat exaggerated description reasonably captures our daily fight against muscle weakness, spasticity, and a lack of motor control and coordination—constantly keeping us on our toes and on guard.
Most significantly, Matt is unaware of the disparity between the Matt that was, is, and could be. His internal sensory channels are not tuned in to feedback about his technique—the actual versus the desired fluidity. No amount of external input or practice, for the time being, can override the absence of, or misinformation, his body asserts, which means that changing his performance is elusive, like chasing one’s shadow.
When the spring sunshine finally enticed us outside, we returned to our ¾-mile loop. Even with practice, his awkward patterns were stuck on repeat, with no apparent way to break the cycle. In brainstorming sessions with the therapy team at the Regional Therapy Center, we discussed various strategies, particularly the benefits of an ankle-foot brace. We expanded our exploration to seeking input from an Orthotist, a specialist in bracing and devices to facilitate function.
Matt underwent a thorough assessment of his spasticity, range of motion, and gait. Mike and I expanded on his medical history, shared our observations, and discussed different types of support. We decided on a custom-made neurophysiological ankle-foot orthotic (NP-AFO) system. The goal was to refine sensory feedback—improving his "internal GPS" (proprioception)—to reduce abnormal tone and support normal alignment throughout the leg, not just of the ankle. Physical therapy and home efforts would be instrumental in maximizing its effectiveness.
The device, a snazzy combination of black and Kelly green high-temperature polypropylene plastic, arrived in June. It was molded to the front of his lower leg, had an attached foot plate, and was secured with Velcro and inserted into his sneaker. Learning to move correctly with it involved trial and error and many grumbles. Matt didn’t like it, and in time, neither did we.
His technique did not advance as we had hoped and dreamed. We seemed to have corrected one problem, only to cause others. Although Matt improved his rhythm and cadence, his right knee could not fully extend or stand firm as he walked over it, nor could it prevent his hip from dropping. Worse, his foot turned in even worse, and consequently, the orthotic didn't reduce how often he stumbled.
The ¾-mile loop was out of the question, so we took several short strolls daily, desperately trying to find a rhyme or rhythm that might lead to a positive result. The brace limited his ankle’s range of motion and made traversing anything other than a flat, firm surface (like a steep ramp or sand) almost impossible. It was frustrating, a lot of work, and Matt begged to discard and burn it, and so we gave up. We went back to the drawing board.
Soon, without the constraint, he was navigating the ¾-mile loop in 18 minutes and intermittently conquering a longer 1¼-mile loop in 29 minutes. It was great to cheer Matt on, praise these achievements, and not have to beg him to wear the AFO. With this sense of freedom, we even tried jogging 20–30 feet, just for fun.
We remain vigilant and attentive to inherent risks when walking long distances in our peaceful neighborhood or in crowded spaces like churches and grocery stores. However, elsewhere, we unwittingly lowered our defenses as his newfound freedom—and ours—grew. We downplayed obvious red flags, such as the danger of his inconsistent performance. We also minimized the implications of Matt’s tendency to "cruise" furniture, walls, or fixtures by not accounting for situations without additional support. We gambled that his ability to compensate could reliably predict his future execution. In July 2019, the gamble failed: Matt suffered a series of falls when he tried activities slightly outside the norm, such as playing mini-golf or trying to get on a rowing machine. These moments served as sobering reminders that ‘normal’ is a fragile state, and a catastrophic setback lurks if we aren’t careful.
With the passage of time, I sometimes question why it’s taking so long to reclaim his self-awareness—from the simple to the risky—even when I know it’s a symptom of a larger disconnect. For instance, he may stop three times to retie his shoe during a single trip in the neighborhood. Or, that inevitably, his right-sided neglect and visual loss cause him to cut corners so close that he nearly clips the large entertainment center, turning into the living room, without recollection. In public spaces, he cuts people off, or worse yet, after passing through an open door, he releases it and nearly clocks an unsuspecting person trailing close behind. Then, I pause and scold myself when his posture and gait worsen because I’ve pushed speed or distance too far.
Our struggles and successes continue to humble me. I must set aside what perplexes me and focus entirely on celebrating every emerging capability I see. I vividly remember when Matt couldn’t climb two or three steps without touching a handrail, and it took him 50 minutes to labor around the small loop with a wheeled walker—or 70 minutes with a quad cane. Back then, it seemed like an eternity as my biceps screamed for mercy while I struggled to hold his weight. With this perspective in mind, I feel deeply grateful for how far we have come and hopeful about better days ahead.
© 2026, Sarah Watkins